|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]于善志,叶志敏.语义角色精细化理论下的题元准则研究[J].宁波大学学报(人文科学版),2022,35(3):66-72.
 YU Shan-zhi,YE Zhi-min.Thematic Criteria Based on the Theory of Semantic Role Elaboration[J].,2022,35(3):66-72.
点击复制

语义角色精细化理论下的题元准则研究(PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》[ISSN:1001-5124/CN:33-1133/C]

卷:
第35卷
期数:
2022年第3期
页码:
66-72
栏目:
语言学研究
出版日期:
2022-05-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Thematic Criteria Based on the Theory of Semantic Role Elaboration
文章编号:
1001 - 5124(2022)03 - 00 66 - 0 7
作者:
于善志叶志敏
(宁波大学 外国语学院,浙江 宁波 315211)
Author(s):
YU Shan-zhi YE Zhi-min
(Faculty of Foreign Languages, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)
关键词:
题元准则语义角色精细化消解方案
Keywords:
thematic criterion semantic role elaboration appropriate solutions
分类号:
H030
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在语义角色精细化理论框架下讨论了英语中的题元角色与论元之间的关系。对题元准则存在的问题进行了分析,介绍了佩里尼的语义角色精细化理论,区分了精细化角色和概括性角色。精细化角色和概括性角色之间存在一条精细化轨道,连接下位的精细化题元关系和上位的语义角色的同时,把精细化题元关系和论元的句法功能联系起来。在任何谓词结构内,每个可见论元都必须充当特定的语义角色,每个语义角色都必须指派给一个可见论元。并对角色精细化题元关系为题元准则具体问题的消解方案进行了讨论。
Abstract:
Under the framework of Semantic Role Elaboration Theory, this study explores the relationship between thematic roles and arguments in English. Firstly, the five problems that the current Theta Criterion Hypot hesis faces are discussed. Then it introduce s Perini’s elaboration theory and distinguishes the elaboration thematic relationship (ETR) from the semantic role (SR). There is an elaboration track between the lower ETR and the upper SR, connecting syntactic function of Theta Criterion Hypothesis with ETR, while linking the elaboration thematic relation and the syntactic function of arguments. Each overt argument in a given predicate structure must act as a specific theta role, and each thematic role must be assigned to a visible argument. The paper discusses the resolution of ETR to specific issues of Theta Criterion.

参考文献/References:

[1].高明乐. 题元角色与题元角色理论[J]. 现代外语, 2003, 26(2): 210-217.
[2].FILLMORE J. The case for case[C]//BACH E, HARMS R. Universals in linguistic the ory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968: 1-90.
[3].CHOMSKY N. Lectures on government and binding[M]. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981: 36.
[4].PERINI M. Thematic relations: a study in the grammar-cognition interface[M]. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2019: 27-43, 177-181.
[5].JACKENDOFF R. Semantic structures[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.
[6].DOWTY R. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection[J]. Language, 1991, 67(3): 547-619.
[7].PRIMUS B. Participant roles[M]//RIEMER N. The routledge handbook of semantics. London: Routledge, 2015: 403-418.
[8].CARNIE A. Syntax: a generative introduction[M]. Malden: Blackwell, 2007: 233, 237-239.
[9].魏在江. 宾语隐形构式的认知特征与语用功能[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2020, (5): 55-64, 149.
[10].温宾利. 当代句法学导论[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2002: 44-59.
[11].GOLDBERG A. Construction: a construction grammar approach to argument structure[M]. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995: 141-151.
[12].SCHLESINGER M. Instruments as agents: on the nature of semantic relations[J]. Journal of linguistics, 1989, 25(1): 189-210.
[13].KAMP H, ROSSDEUTSCHER A. Remarks on lexical structure and DRS construction[J]. Theoretical linguistics, 1994, 20(2-3): 97-164.
[14].KOENIG J-P, MAUNER G, BIENVENUE B, et al. What with? The anatomy of a proto-role[J]. Journal of semantics, 2008, 25(2): 175-220.
[15].SHOPEN T. Language typology and syntactic description: volume 1, clause structure[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 136-139.
[16].WILLIAMS A. Arguments in syntax and semantics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 121-135, 163-179.
[17].SHETREET E, FRIEDMANN N, HADAR U. Cortical representation of verbs with optional complements: The theoretical contribution of fMRI[J]. Human Brain Mapping, 2010, 31(5): 770-785.
[18].RECANATI F. Unarticulated constituents[J]. Linguistics and philosophy, 2002, 25(3): 299-345.
[19].NEALE S. On location[C]//O’ROURKE M, WASHINGTON C. Situating semantics: essays on the philosophy of John Perry. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2007: 251-393.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-05-09